The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor.Full Bio

 

Verdict with Ted Cruz: Chinese Communist Spies in the Democrat party, plus

Chinese Communist Spies, Democrat Silence, and a Virginia Power Grab: Inside the Latest Episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz

In the latest episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and co‑host Ben Ferguson deliver a wide‑ranging, hard‑hitting examination of what they describe as “blue states gone wild,” focusing on two explosive developments with national implications: the indictment and guilty plea of a sitting Democrat mayor in California who admitted to acting as an illegal agent of the Chinese Communist Party, and a stunning decision by the Virginia Supreme Court striking down what the hosts characterize as a radically partisan redistricting scheme that Democrats now want overturned at any cost.

Throughout the episode, Cruz and Ferguson argue that these stories are not isolated scandals, but symptoms of a much larger pattern—one involving foreign influence, institutional corruption, and an increasingly open embrace by Democrats of raw power over constitutional limits.

A Sitting Democrat Mayor Admits to Acting as a Chinese Communist Agent

The episode opens with what Cruz calls one of the most alarming political stories in modern American history: the federal indictment and guilty plea of Eileen Wang, a Democrat mayor in Arcadia, California, who admitted in court that she acted as an illegal agent of the People’s Republic of China. According to the Department of Justice filing read aloud during the episode, Wang secretly coordinated with Chinese government officials to promote pro‑PRC propaganda inside the United States.

Cruz emphasizes that this is not a case of political accusations or partisan speculation. Wang agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge that carries a potential sentence of up to ten years in federal prison. By her own admission, she received directives from Chinese Communist Party officials and disseminated their messaging through a website presented as a news source for Chinese‑American communities. The hosts note that this included posting pre‑written propaganda denying the existence of genocide and forced labor in Xinjiang—material allegedly authored directly by CCP officials.

What makes the case unprecedented, Cruz argues, is that Wang was not merely a staffer or a peripheral political actor. She was an elected official—a mayor—chosen by American voters while secretly advancing the interests of a hostile foreign power.

Democrat Silence and a Pattern of CCP Infiltration

A central question raised repeatedly throughout the episode is why Democrats have largely remained silent about the case. Cruz asks whether a single prominent Democrat has publicly condemned the fact that an elected official from their party admitted to working for the Chinese Communist Party. According to the hosts, the answer is no.

The discussion then broadens to what Cruz describes as a disturbing pattern. He cites past examples involving Democrat officials and staff connected to Chinese intelligence operations, including spies embedded in congressional offices, senior aides to governors, and even intimate relationships with elected officials. While stressing that not every Democrat is complicit, Cruz argues that the CCP appears to view the Democratic Party as “open for business” due to its institutional ties to powerful interests heavily invested in China.

Those interests, according to Cruz, include Big Tech, Big Business, Hollywood, and major universities—each of which he says has deep financial and ideological entanglements with Beijing. The hosts contend that this ecosystem creates vulnerabilities that foreign adversaries are eager to exploit.

A Weak Deterrent: Espionage Sentencing and National Security Risks

Ferguson raises a critical point about deterrence, questioning whether current federal sentencing guidelines are remotely sufficient to discourage Americans from spying for hostile foreign governments. In the Arcadia case, the maximum penalty is ten years, and Cruz notes that actual time served could be significantly less.

The hosts argue that when individuals can betray their country, influence elections, and aid adversaries like China, yet still expect to resume normal life after a relatively short prison term, the incentive structure is dangerously flawed. Cruz asserts that espionage on behalf of America’s enemies should carry far harsher consequences if the United States is serious about defending its sovereignty.

To underscore how widespread the problem has become, Cruz references a case in w


Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content